⚡️ While Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 and Code Llama are impressive coding assistants, the idea that they can “one-shot” fully functional apps is more myth than reality. Developers remain skeptical—and for good reason.
🎯 Can LLMs Really One-Shot Apps?
The dream of typing a single prompt and getting a complete, working app in return is compelling. It’s a vision that’s been hyped across social media and tech demos. But when you look closer—especially through the eyes of seasoned developers—the story is more nuanced. A recent X thread by Klaas (@forgebitz) sparked a candid conversation about the real capabilities of LLMs in software development, revealing a mix of admiration, frustration, and healthy skepticism.
🤔 The Reality Behind the Hype
The “One-Shot” Illusion
Klaas kicked off the discussion by questioning the claim that LLMs can generate full apps in a single go. While he acknowledged their usefulness, he pointed out that complex tasks—like integrating cloud services—often trip up LLMs due to incomplete or outdated documentation. His frustration mirrors a common sentiment: LLMs are great at filling in the blanks, but they can’t read between the lines when the map is missing.
Developer Voices: Real Talk from the Trenches
In the replies, other developers echoed this cautious optimism:
- Benjamin (@BenjaminDEKR) was blunt: LLMs don’t magically build multiplayer 3D games. They require hours of manual tweaking—or as he put it, “beating with hammers.”
- Gonçalo (@iamgoncaloalves) noted LLMs shine at simple, well-scoped tasks, but struggle with anything that demands deep reasoning or architectural planning.
- André (@dreetje) offered a balanced view: LLMs might not one-shot apps, but they accelerate development by helping tackle features one by one.
This aligns with findings from neptune.ai, which highlights that LLMs often underperform in zero-shot scenarios, especially for niche or complex domains. Similarly, codesubmit.io points out that tools like Code Llama are best suited for straightforward programming tasks, not full-stack software solutions.
Why the Confusion?
Some of the hype may stem from social media engagement tactics. Demos often show cherry-picked examples where everything works perfectly. But in real-world dev environments, context, nuance, and iteration are king. LLMs can generate code—but maintaining, debugging, and integrating it still falls to the developer.
✅ Key Takeaways
- LLMs are powerful assistants, not autonomous app creators.
- Complex tasks like cloud integration or game development still require deep human oversight and domain knowledge.
- Social media demos often oversell what LLMs can do in one shot.
- Feature-by-feature development with LLMs can be a huge productivity boost, even if the process isn’t magical.
- Documentation gaps and reasoning limitations are major hurdles for LLMs in real-world coding.
🎉 Wrapping Up: LLMs Are Tools, Not Magic Wands
The idea of one-shot app development with LLMs is exciting—but developers aren’t buying the hype wholesale, and rightly so. These models are best seen as collaborators, helping us write code faster and explore new ideas, not as replacements for the hard work of software engineering.
If you’ve tried building something with an LLM, what was your experience? Did it deliver what you expected—or did you find yourself reaching for the hammer too? Let us know in the comments or join the conversation online.
📚 Further Reading & Related Topics
If you’re exploring developer skepticism around large language models (LLMs) and their ability to one-shot entire apps, these related articles will provide deeper insights:
• Why AI May Never Fully Replace Programmers: The Human Element in Software Development – Dive into the nuanced role of developers even in an AI-driven era, and why context, judgment, and experience still matter in app design and engineering.
• The Future of Coding: How AI-Enhanced IDEs Are Changing the Game – Explore how LLMs support—not replace—developers by boosting productivity through tools like Copilot, Cursor, and other AI-powered IDE integrations.
These articles help ground the hype in reality, acknowledging the impressive power of LLMs while reinforcing the irreplaceable insight developers bring to real-world systems.
References
X Posts
1. Klaas (@forgebitz) – Post ID: 1907147347219390813, April 1, 2025, 19:05 UTC
“wtf are people doing with LLMs that they can oneshot entire apps…”
2. Benjamin De Kraker (@BenjaminDEKR) – Post ID: 1907147755992019216, April 1, 2025, 19:07 UTC
“@forgebitz I think many are exaggerating/ faking for engagement…”
3. Klaas (@forgebitz) – Post ID: 1907147963643637785, April 1, 2025, 19:08 UTC
“@BenjaminDEKR must be, because you can 100% build amazing stuff with it but now doing some cloud stuff…”
4. Gonçalo Alves (@iamgoncaloalves) – Post ID: 1907149235599868220, April 1, 2025, 19:13 UTC
“@forgebitz It’s wild how LLMs seem to effortlessly crank out simple stuff, but struggle when you need them to actually think…”
5. Klaas (@forgebitz) – Post ID: 1907149527582171342, April 1, 2025, 19:14 UTC
“@iamgoncaloalves makes sense, that’s the training data”
6. Brett (@BrettFromDJ) – Post ID: 1907152664426610925, April 1, 2025, 19:26 UTC
“@forgebitz Maybe, just maybe, not everything is as it appears on X.”
7. Klaas (@forgebitz) – Post ID: 1907152999392399751, April 1, 2025, 19:28 UTC
“@BrettFromDJ concerning”
8. arthur (@arthurbnhm) – Post ID: 1907153634514649565, April 1, 2025, 19:30 UTC
“@forgebitz i built an entire app similar to photoai from @levelsio without writing a single line of code…”
9. Klaas (@forgebitz) – Post ID: 1907156134571475088, April 1, 2025, 19:40 UTC
“@arthurbnhm @levelsio i mean yeah but that is exactly not one shotting…”
10. André Foeken (@dreetje) – Post ID: 1907157338860970227, April 1, 2025, 19:45 UTC
“@forgebitz One shot, no. But it helped me build my entire Mac app…”
11. Klaas (@forgebitz) – Post ID: 1907158018082340946, April 1, 2025, 19:47 UTC
“@dreetje oh no 100% i do the same, i love it…”
Web Results
1. Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Learning with LLMs – neptune.ai, Published: September 25, 2024
Discusses zero-shot and few-shot learning in LLMs, noting their limitations for specialized tasks requiring nuanced or proprietary knowledge.
2. AI Code Tools: The Ultimate Guide in 2025 – codesubmit.io, Published: February 24, 2025
Highlights that tools like Code Llama excel in simpler coding tasks but have limitations like reasoning errors for complex tasks.
3. The Ultimate Guide to LLM Feature Development – latitude.so, Published: January 22, 2025
Explains fine-tuning methods for LLMs, emphasizing their customization for specific tasks but not addressing one-shot capabilities.
4. Cursor – The AI Code Editor – http://www.cursor.com
Describes Cursor as a popular AI-enabled code editor praised for productivity, supporting the thread’s sentiment of LLMs being useful for feature-by-feature development.
Let me know if you’d like a Markdown version or if you’re adding footnotes for inline references.
Scalable Human Blog 
Leave a comment