Scalable Human Blog

⚡️ TL;DR: Despite rapid tech advancements and predictions of AI driven transformations, many foundational technologies like relational databases and COBOL continue to thrive due to their reliability and the high costs of change, reminding us that proven tools often outlast hype.

🎯 Ever wonder why some tech from decades ago still powers our world, even as buzzwords like AI and microservices promise to revolutionize everything? In this post, we’ll explore startling technologies that refuse to fade away, drawing from real world examples and insights on future shifts. You’ll gain a fresh perspective on why “old” doesn’t always mean obsolete, and how this persistence shapes software engineering today.

🤔

The Enduring Classics: Tech That Sticks Around

In a fast paced tech landscape, it’s surprising how many foundational tools remain staples. Take relational databases, for instance. Despite the rise of NoSQL options for handling massive, unstructured data, relational systems like SQL still dominate in enterprises where data integrity and transactions matter most. A bank managing millions of accounts isn’t rushing to ditch what’s worked flawlessly for years.

Similarly, object oriented programming (OOP) holds strong. Functional programming promised cleaner code with fewer bugs, but OOP’s familiarity keeps it central in languages like Java and C++. Developers often stick with what they know, prioritizing quick builds over theoretical purity.

Legacy Powerhouses in Action

COBOL, born in the 1950s, still runs critical systems in finance and government. Modern languages haven’t displaced it because migrating legacy codebases is a nightmare, costly and risky. Imagine a government’s payroll system grinding to a halt during a switch, that’s why “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” reigns supreme.

Mainframe systems echo this. The cloud offers scalability, but not everything has migrated. These beasts handle high volume transactions reliably, like airline reservations, where downtime costs fortunes.

Architectures and Methods That Persist

Monolithic architectures linger despite microservices’ modularity. In smaller teams or stable apps, a single codebase is simpler to manage than a web of services. Waterfall methodology, with its linear planning, survives in regulated industries like aerospace, where agile’s flexibility could introduce compliance headaches.

On the API front, SOAP endures in enterprises for its strict standards, even as REST and GraphQL gain traction for web apps. And password authentication? Biometrics and passwordless options exist, but they’re not universal, users and systems cling to the familiar login ritual.

Why the Resistance? Common Threads

These technologies share key traits: migration is slow and expensive, they offer proven reliability, and they’re easy for teams to use. Practicality trumps cutting edge efficiency when stability is key. This echoes broader insights on tech evolution.

Balancing this, consider predictions from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Based on a Reddit post titled “Sam Altman: Software Engineering Will Be Very [Different/Transformed]”, Altman foresees AI automating routine coding, shifting engineers to oversee systems and solve big problems. This could democratize development, but it hasn’t erased these stalwarts yet, the gap between prediction and reality highlights tech’s inertial force.

✅ Key Takeaways:

• Embrace reliability over hype: Technologies like COBOL and relational databases persist because they deliver consistent results without the risks of unproven alternatives.
• Factor in migration costs: High expenses and potential disruptions keep legacy systems in place, especially in finance and government.
• Value familiarity: Developers and organizations often choose tools they’re comfortable with, prioritizing ease over emerging trends like functional programming or microservices.
• Anticipate AI’s role: As per Sam Altman’s insights shared on Reddit, AI may automate coding basics, but it won’t instantly overhaul established tech stacks.
• Balance old and new: Recognize that proven tech provides a stable foundation, even as innovations promise transformation.

🎉 In the end, these startling technologies remind us that innovation doesn’t always mean replacement, reliability and practicality often win out. As AI evolves, per Altman’s vision, we might see more blending of old and new. What’s a “legacy” tech you’ve encountered that surprised you? Share in the comments, or explore how it fits into your work.

📚 Further Reading & Related Topics
If you’re exploring shocking old technologies we still use today, these related articles will provide deeper insights:
• Leaving Legacy Code Better Than You Found It: The Developer’s Dilemma – This article discusses the challenges of working with outdated legacy codebases, offering practical advice on improving them incrementally, which complements the main post by exploring why and how old tech persists in modern development.
• Why a Big Bang Rewrite of a System is a Bad Idea in Software Development – It examines the risks of completely overhauling legacy systems, explaining why gradual updates are often better, directly relating to the theme of shocking old technologies that remain in use due to rewrite complexities.
• Embracing Modern Java: Strategies for Upgrading and Optimizing Enterprise Applications – This piece covers techniques for modernizing Java, an enduring “old” technology from the 1990s still powering enterprises, expanding on the post’s focus by highlighting upgrade paths for persistent legacy tech.